Patents | Copyright | Trade Marks

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player


Intellectual Property News
Loading...
View more from Smit & Van Wyk, Inc.





Articles
  • SA Institute of Intellectual Property Law
  • Trade mark practitioners
  • Brand Names
  • Uniform Domain Name Dispute
  • Document counterfeiting


  • Plagiarism
  • Civil Law
  • Public law
  • Private law
  • Internet plagiarism


  • All Rights Reserved
  • Moral rights
  • Pirate copies
  • Exclusive rights
  • Pfizer patent infringement suit


  • Patent Appeals
  • IBM Patents
  • Patent Duration
  • Pirate Software
  • Common Law


  • Copyright | Patents | Trademarks



    Smit & Van Wyk, Inc.

    Pfizer patent infringement suit

    The Pfizer patent infringement suit

    The Pfizer patent infringement suit has made headlines the last couple of months. The large pharmaceutical giants of Pfizer and Teva battled it out in court over a generic version of a drug patented by Pfizer, called Protonix.

    The Pfizer patent infringement suit is an example of how a patent can be challenged and how rights can be infringed because of technicalities. Teva, a US based pharmaceutical giant, makes its money from the production and distribution of generic alternatives to brand name medication. There is always a risk of patent infringement in their business.

    Teva is well aware of the risks involved and the chances of losing patent infringement cases, but they nevertheless take the risk based on the large profits to be realized in the six months of being able to market their generic versions.

    The Pfizer patent infringement suit, however, has cost Teva a pretty penny in damages since Teva has lost the case. Teva is expected to file an appeal on the jury verdict. The company also has argued that a judge and not a jury should decide whether there was double patenting involved on Pfizer’s side.

    Should a settlement not be reached, Teva will be liable for damages of more than 1.1 billion US dollars.

    The settlement may include agreements on other infringement claims. From the above information about the Pfizer patent infringement suit it becomes clear that no company is safe from infringement attempts or lawsuits. Contact us at Smit & Van Wyk for patent litigation assistance.




    Foreign Agents | Patents | Design | Trade Mark | Copyright | Biotech | Download | Contact
    Intellectual Property News | Sitemap | Articles | Links | Copyright © 2005 to 2011 Smit & Van Wyk, Inc.